Addressing the Impacts of Climate Change on Mental Health and Well-Being

  • Date: Nov 05 2019
  • Policy Number: 20196

Key Words: Climate Change, Mental Health

Abstract

Climate change is widely presaged as the most serious threat to public health in the 21st century while also being recognized as an opportunity to advance the public’s health. The increasing incidence of devastating climate-related disasters (e.g., hurricanes, floods, droughts, wildfires, and heat waves) demonstrates that no part of the planet or group of people are safe from the pervasive effects of such events. Factors such as age, race, socioeconomic status, migration status, and/or living with acute stress, a physical disability, or mental health or substance use disorders make individuals and groups more vulnerable to the effects of climate change, especially in low-resource settings with fragile infrastructures such as those frequently found in developing countries. Current threats of climate change to the Earth’s physical environment and essential actions needed for adaptation and mitigation are widely acknowledged. Many stakeholders around the world and in the United States have highlighted the effects of climate change on human health, inequities in response, and steps that can mitigate impacts and adapt public health systems (and other societal infrastructures) toward a new “climate normal.” However, immediate and ongoing threats to mental health and well-being have yet to be equally addressed and prioritized. This policy statement integrates existing global and U.S. efforts and calls on all stakeholders to actively prioritize, implement, and finance actions that more comprehensively address climate change impacts on mental health, well-being, and resilience (both structural and psychosocial) with cultural sensitivity. It serves as APHA’s only proposed or existing policy statement on this topic to date.

Relationship to Existing APHA Policy Statements

Twenty-six APHA policy statements are relevant to this proposed policy because of their explicit explanation of, or brief reference to, the effects of climate change on health, mental health, and/or specific groups. No policy statement to date is comprehensive in its attention to the effects of climate change on mental health, which is the goal of this statement. The 26 existing policy statements below were selected because of their relevance to three main content areas:

U.S. and/or global public health approaches to climate change

  • APHAPolicy Statement 20157: Public Health Opportunities to Address the Health Effects of Climate Change
  • APHA Policy Statement 20078: Addressing the Urgent Threat of Global Climate Change to Public Health and the Environment
  • APHA Policy Statement 9510: Global Climate Change
  • APHA Policy Statement 201512: Ensuring That Trade Agreements Promote Public Health

Links among public health systems, health systems, health policies, and climate change

  • APHA Policy Statement 201210: Promoting Health Impact Assessment to Achieve Health in All Policies
  • APHA Policy Statement 200911: Public Health’s Critical Role in Health Reform in the United States
  • APHA Policy Statement 20089: Strengthening Health Systems in Developing Countries
  • APHA Policy Statement 20171: Supporting Research and Evidence-Based Public Health Practice in State and Local Health Agencies
  • APHA Policy Statement 201013: American Public Health Association Child Health Policy for the United States

Links among the environment, health, mental health, and climate change

  • APHA Policy Statement 20038: Supporting a Nationwide Environmental Health Tracking Network to Identify Links Between the Environment and Human Health
  • APHA Policy Statement 20042: Reducing Health Disparities in People with Disabilities through Improved Environmental Programmatic and Service Access
  • APHA Policy Statement 201415: Support for Social Determinants of Behavioral Health and Pathways for Integrated and Better Public Health
  • APHA Policy Statement 201710: Protecting Children’s Environmental Health: A Comprehensive Framework
  • APHA Policy Statement< 20137: Improving Health and Wellness through Access to Nature
  • APHA Policy Statement 20069: Response to Disasters: Protection of Rescue and Recovery Workers, Volunteers, and Residents Responding to Disasters
  • APHA Policy Statement 20093: Food Crises: Addressing the Current Crisis and Preventing the Next One
  • APHA Policy Statement 200712: Toward a Healthy Sustainable Food System
  • APHA Policy Statement 201711: Public Health Opportunities to Address the Health Effects of Air Pollution
  • APHA Policy Statement 200017: Confirming Need for Protective National Health Based Air Quality Standards
  • APHA Policy Statement 200012: Reducing the Rising Rates of Asthma
  • APHA Policy Statement 20125: The Environmental and Occupational Health Impacts of High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing of Unconventional Gas Reserves
  • APHA Policy Statement 20126: Anticipating and Addressing Sources of Pollution to Preserve Coastal Watersheds, Coastal Waters, and Human Health
  • APHA Policy Statement 20147: Preventing Environmental and Occupational Health Effects of Diesel Exhaust
  • APHA Policy Statement 20046: Affirming The Necessity of a Secure, Sustainable and Health Protective Energy Policy
  • APHA Policy Statement 20099: Improving Health Through Transportation and Land-Use Policies

Problem Statement

The world’s authoritative body on climate change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), defines this threat as “a change in the state of the climate that can be identified [statistically] by changes in the mean and/or the variability of its properties and that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer.”[1] The IPCC affirms that warming of the climate system is unequivocal: the atmosphere and oceans have warmed, snow and ice have diminished, and sea levels have risen.[1] The panel further concludes that virtually all such warming since the mid-1800s is the result of human activities.[2]

Despite ratification (formal consent or adoption) of the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change[3] by 187 countries (including the United States) to help slow global warming to no more than 1.5 C by the end of the 21st century, concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have reached new highs.[4] Preliminary data for 2018 show that these gases have continued to rise and are linked to changes in the Earth’s climate, including increases in atmospheric and oceanic warming, ocean acidification, and rising sea levels.[4] The years 2015 through 2018 constituted the four hottest on record, and the highest ocean temperatures on record were reported in 2017–2018.[4] Ocean acidification is increasing due to the ocean absorbing more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (causing stress on marine life), and sea levels are rising as a result of thermal expansion of warming oceans and unprecedented melting of glaciers and ice sheets.[4] Natural disasters and climate-related events—hurricanes, typhoons, tsunamis, droughts, wildfires, floods, and extreme heat—increased by an estimated 46% between 2000 and 2017[4] and continued to be prevalent in 2018. Examples include the 2017 hurricane season in the United States and the Caribbean and, in 2018, the Pacific typhoon season; prolonged droughts in California, the southwestern region of the United States, and parts of Europe and Africa; severe flooding in regions around the world; and unprecedented heat waves in Japan and Europe. Climatic changes were also associated with unprecedented wildfire severities in California during 2017–2018, Spain and Portugal in 2017, and Sweden and Greece in 2018.[5,6]

Although impacts of climate change and climate-related events are present globally, climate change most severely affects groups already vulnerable due to geography, poverty, age, gender, indigenous status, migration status,[7–10] preexisting environmental conditions (e.g., unhealthy air, water, and living conditions and weak emergency preparedness),[7–10] physical disabilities, and/or preexisting health, mental health, and/or substance use disorders.[5,7–10] Professionals who address the immediate and longer-term effects of climate change (e.g., first responders, journalists, health care workers) are also more vulnerable.[9–12] Women (and especially widows) are often more emotionally affected than men after a climate change event, partly due to increased stress brought on by expanded responsibilities such as providing increased caregiving for children and elderly parents, assuming traditional male responsibilities, facing financial hardships, and defending against violence (e.g., in relocation camps).[9,10,13,14] Men may struggle with feelings of guilt, inadequacy, and stigma associated with their inability to work and provide for their family after a climate-related event. Communities located in ecologically sensitive areas (e.g., areas that lack water or are vulnerable to sea level rise, storm surges, and/or melting sea ice) are often the least able to prepare for, respond to, and fully recover from extreme climate-related events.[5,8,10,15,16]

Climate change and climate-related events are associated with a wide scope of impacts that affect human well-being, or the satisfaction people feel with life when they are functioning effectively and when their psychological, emotional, economic, and social needs are being met in positive ways.[17] Such impacts can be (1) social and economic (e.g., border displacement, migration, and/or homelessness; water shortages; hunger or malnutrition; impoverishment or unemployment; increased levels of conflict, hostility, intergroup aggression or violence, or crime; and loss of social cohesion),[5,8,9,16,18] (2) emotional (e.g., psychosocial distress, grief, depression, feelings of helplessness and fear, and survivor guilt; development of mental health and/or substance use disorders; recovery fatigue; and loss of social support structures),[8,9,16] (3) cognitive (e.g., confusion, lack of concentration, and memory loss), or (4) behavioral (e.g., loss of a sense of control, nightmares, disruption of eating and/or sleeping, changes in sexual activity, and dysfunctional behavior due to impaired cognitive development, especially among children).[8,9,19] Climate change and climate-related events can also result in altered effectiveness of psychiatric medications,[8] spiritual distress (e.g., loss of faith or meaning of life, feelings of fatalism), and death or suicide.[8,9]

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that between 20% and 40% of populations affected by natural disasters will experience mild psychological distress, and 30% to 50% will experience moderate to severe psychological distress.[20] While support from family, friends, and communities makes recovery possible for many, others need professional help. For example, in the United States, 49% of Hurricane Katrina survivors in New Orleans developed an anxiety or mood disorder, one in six people developed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and reports of suicidal ideation and suicide more than doubled.[21] After Hurricane Sandy in New York City and New Jersey, high levels of depression, anxiety, and PTSD were recorded in the short term, and high levels of psychological trauma were still experienced four years later.[22] Similar results were observed in Houston, Texas, after Hurricane Harvey.[23] Widespread psychological trauma continues to be reported after Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico, with the suicide rate continuing to rise in 2019.[24]

A systematic review of literature published between 1994 and 2014 revealed consistent evidence across both developing and developed countries that flooding has led to increased rates of PTSD, anxiety, depression, and use of psychotropic medication.[25] Studies on the effects of heat waves have documented many negative outcomes, including heightened mortality and morbidity among people with mental health disorders,[8,9,16,26] altered effectiveness of psychiatric medications,[8,26] a rise in homicide rates,[9,18] increases in suicide and violence,[9,18,26,27] and an increased risk for hospitalization and death among individuals with dementia.[9,26] Poor air quality (which often accompanies higher ambient temperatures) has been linked to increased rates of childhood depression and anxiety and reduced functioning among people with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and autism.[8,19,28] Evidence across continents suggests that droughts in rural communities place farmers (especially male farmers) at risk for high rates of depression and suicide.[29] Research on the 2017–2018 California wildfires suggests that effects on mental health and well-being were similar to those arising from other extreme weather events.[30]

These impacts on mental health and well-being are considerable when placed in the context of the general burden of mental health conditions. Globally, mental health conditions are the leading causes of increased years lived with disability and (together with cardiovascular and circulatory diseases) disability-adjusted life-years.[31] WHO estimates that one in four individuals will experience a mental health condition during their lifetime.[32] Yet, a major gap exists because fewer than one third of people in need will receive professional help.[32] In developing countries, WHO estimates this treatment gap to be about 75%.[32] In the United States, 44.7 million adults (one in six overall) live with a mental health disorder, but only 19.2 million (43.1% of those in need) receive mental health services.[33]

Spending and investment in mental health services are not proportional to the existing and projected burden of mental health disorders. Currently, the global economic cost of mental health disorders is estimated at $2.5 trillion, and this figure is expected to double by 2030.[34] Globally, public expenditures on mental health average $2.50 per capita, with a low of $0.02 per capita in low-income countries and a high of $80.24 in high-income countries.[35] In addition, the mental health workforce averages nine workers per 100,000 population globally, with 1.6 workers per 100,000 population in low-income countries and 71.7 workers per 100,000 population in high-income countries.[35] These numbers show that an adequate workforce is critical to future spending determinations and service provision for the underserved.

Examples of global and U.S. efforts to encourage building service system infrastructure and capacity to better meet mental health and substance use needs in general, and specifically with regard to climate change, include the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,[36] the United Nations Universal Health Coverage Political Declaration,[37] the Astana Declaration on Primary Health Care,[38] the WHO Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan (and related initiatives),[32,39] health care reform in the United States (via the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health and Parity and Addictions Equity Act),[40] and new financial investments for action to combat climate change by global institutions such as the World Bank (which has pledged $200 billion to do so in 2021–2025).[41]

Despite the documented negative effects of climate change on mental health and well-being, many people demonstrate remarkable resilience and even may experience “posttraumatic growth,” namely increased confidence in coping, closeness and connection with others, and the capacity to develop new meaning or hope.[42] This policy statement is intended to motivate the prioritization and implementation of actions that can further facilitate positive mental health and well-being outcomes as related to climate change and climate-related events. Because a large part of this motivation is intertwined with the complex politics surrounding climate change,[43] this statement is also intended to help facilitate the positive political will needed to reach such outcomes.

Evidence-Based Strategies to Address the Problem

The science of climate-informed mental health continues to evolve. While no universally recognized body of literature on “best or evidence-based practices” exists to date, five tenets guide the quest to formally establish and expand strategies, practices, policies, and actions that can successfully combat the negative effects of climate change and climate-related events on mental health and well-being. First, there is considerable evidence that climate change and climate-related events impact mental health. Second, there is broad agreement that interventions and evaluations should target multiple levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary) of public health concerns, including the development and sustainability of resilience and posttraumatic growth.[8,9,44,45] Third, there is a considerable need to expand research and regularly implement tools that (1) provide evidence-based support for climate-informed planning of mental health services, especially in emergency, high-risk, and low resource settings and in the context of global and U.S. health care reforms[32,35,38,40,46,47]; (2) help predict those who are at high risk and vulnerable to effects of climate change and climate-related events (through efforts such as the United States Global Change Research Program) via mental health–specific indicators[8,10,46–48]; (3) help assess the effectiveness of preevent and postevent mental health interventions across settings and cultures[46,48] using instruments such as the Psychological Preparedness for Natural Disasters scale[49]; and (4) measure the impacts of climate adaptation on mental health.[50]

Fourth, a combination of frameworks and research that are ecological (e.g., at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy levels) and multidisciplinary (e.g., mental health, health, public health, neuroscience, environmental studies, ecopsychology, ethics, social policy and planning, disaster risk reduction, workforce development, health promotion) is needed to compassionately, scientifically, and all-inclusively plan for and address the negative effects of climate change and climate-related events on mental health and well-being.[51] Finally, better strategies are needed to support and train professionals and paraprofessionals who help others deal with the effects of climate change and climate-related events on mental health,[52,53] including the mental health and physical effects they may experience.[11,12] For example, workers who receive preexposure disaster mental health training experience lower levels of PTSD and are better positioned to provide compassionate support to survivors.[54]

Professionals, paraprofessionals, volunteers, and students can benefit from becoming more climate informed so that they can better integrate projections about future mental health demands emanating from climate change into planning, capacity-building, and service needs.[8,16] The description that follows highlights some of the most promising and established strategies from (1) peer-reviewed articles and other types of research reports and (2) plans and initiatives developed and adopted by well-respected global and U.S. governmental authorities and policy- and consensus-building bodies.

Primary interventions are designed to help prevent and/or reduce exposure to climate-related risks that could have a negative impact on mental health and well-being. Three types of primary interventions are key: those that focus on environmental issues, those that focus on inequities and social injustices, and those that are mental health specific. Environmental approaches include reducing greenhouse gas emissions,[5] facilitating people’s engagement with nature[5,8,55] and climate action,[8] reducing exposures to construction in high-risk zones,[5,8] and climate-proofing property. People who engage with nature[55,56] and/or climate action[11] have been shown to experience “active hope,” which helps facilitate resilience and promote self-efficacy.[16] Green spaces have also been shown to facilitate development of social support and social cohesion within communities, factors that support positive mental health and psychosocial resilience.[8]

Primary interventions that focus on equity and social justice include addressing environmental, social, and health inequities (e.g., poverty and racism); strengthening social cohesion in vulnerable communities; monitoring the implementation of guidelines by local U.S. health departments that target health inequities,[8,11,51,57] and supporting tools that involve communities in solution building, such as participatory research methods.[58] Typically, communities characterized by inequity are not considered to be strongly resilient.[8] Interventions designed to redress inequities (e.g., lack of affordable housing and economic opportunities) and social injustices (e.g., fragmented or nonexistent community infrastructure and services) before climate-associated events occur have been shown to increase psychosocial resilience[8,59] and recovery[44] following such events. Strengthening social cohesion and social support helped promote recovery from trauma after Hurricane Katrina,[60] the 2003 French heat wave,[61,62] and the 2007 flooding event in the United Kingdom.[63] Also, participating in group interventions has been shown to reduce symptoms of anxiety associated with experiencing climate-related events.[51]

Successful primary interventions that are mental health specific include disseminating accurate information about potential climate change effects on mental health and well-being, encouraging self-help activities, and expanding service system capacity to target a variety of cultural needs[64,65]; addressing underlying risk factors contributing to vulnerability to climate change effects[8,16]; increasing training to raise awareness about mental health impacts and reduced stigma associated with experiencing climate change effects[8,16]; and building competencies to address the effects of climate change on multiple life dimensions.[8,16] Interventions that help develop psychological preparedness prior to a traumatic event (such as a climate event) result in fewer negative mental health and psychosocial outcomes, higher levels of situational preparedness, and reduced psychosocial stress.[8,44,45]

Secondary interventions are delivered immediately or shortly after a climate-related event to help prevent or limit the impact on mental health symptoms and to facilitate restoration of well-being as quickly as possible. Examples of successful approaches include delivering psychological first aid[16,64,65]; addressing mental health symptoms and/or disorders in community respite shelters, recreation centers, and drop-in centers[66]; delivering trauma-informed individual and group-based therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, stress inoculation training, and crisis counseling[16]; minimizing stress with respect to meeting basic needs by providing situation-specific support such as food, shelter/housing, postevent insurance and assistance with claim processing, relocation assistance, employment, and income[66–68]; planning and delivering comprehensive mental health and other support services during climate-related emergencies[65]; and providing services wherever people congregate, such as in emergency shelters, religious centers, and formal social service settings.[16] Tertiary interventions aim to help people manage more serious and longer-term mental health and well-being issues by engaging in longer-term professional mental health and/or substance use treatment.[68]

Reducing the negative mental health impacts following climate events often depends on how those affected can develop, enhance, and utilize personal resilience (the set of beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that carry people through difficult times).[8,59] This resilience develops in the context of sociocultural and organizational networks[8,69] and can be cultivated by teaching coping skills, strengthening self-efficacy, and building cohesion and social support across communities.[8,16,42,69,70] Family social support has been shown to be critical in fostering resilience and postevent recovery among children and youth.[8] In addition, anniversary group interventions after a climate change event decrease lingering emotional symptoms.[71]

Several global and U.S.-based initiatives hold promise to better meet mental health and other support needs related to climate change and climate-related events. Globally, the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (adopted by all UN member states in 2015, including the United States) incorporates 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets that governments pledge to achieve by 2030. These SDGs and targets include Target 3.4 (promoting mental health and well-being), Target 3.8 (achieving universal health coverage), and Goal 13 (taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts).[36] The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 describes the roles of national governments and other stakeholders to reduce disaster risks and losses and to “enhance [the provision of] psychosocial support and mental health services for all people in need.”[72] The Inter-Agency Standing Committee’s Guidelines for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings provides a framework for planning and coordinating recovery and rehabilitation interventions addressing the mental health and well-being of individuals in emergency situations.[65] Also, the Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration notes the importance of psychological and other counseling services and psychosocial assistance for migrant and refugee populations, including climate refugees.[73]

In the United States, the Climate and Health Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides critical guidance, technical support, and funding to prepare and protect the country from the harmful impacts of climate change. State and local health and public health departments are developing climate and health adaptation plans using the CDC’s Building Resilience Against Climate Change (BRACE) model to address mental health and well-being impacts of climate change.[74] Moreover, the American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica have developed evidence-based policy recommendations, including 26 strategies and technical assistance guidelines, to address the impacts of climate change on mental health and motivate action.[8]

This policy statement urges all stakeholders to engage in explicit actions to fully plan for and implement the initiatives, agreements, legislation, programs, and intervention strategies discussed here so that the negative effects of climate change and climate-related events on mental health and well-being can be more fully addressed both around the world and in the United States.

Opposing Arguments/Evidence

Groups continue to emerge around the world and within the United States that question the credibility of climate science, dispute proposed actions to stop the impacts of climate change, openly do not support agreements or legislation that can help decrease threats of climate change to the environment, and/or disseminate information that is often perceived to be controversial. While skepticism is an important and healthy part of science and policy-making,[75] the bases for support, decision making, and service provision regarding any mental health, health, and/or public health need must be grounded in facts, fair-minded values, and actions that can result in appropriately targeted and equitable care.

Climate skeptics who challenge the results of otherwise highly respected climate research, such as that conducted by the IPCC, assert that there is no real consensus among the scientific community about the causes, or even the existence, of climate change.[76] These skeptics include about 27% of Americans.[77] Criticism of the IPCC’s position on climate change is questionable for a few reasons: (1) only 3% to 10% of climate scientists do not agree with the IPCC’s systematic reviews and conclusions[78]; (2) the IPCC’s systematic review of 6,000 scientific studies showed that the window of opportunity to limit global warming by adhering to the 2015 Paris Agreement’s 1.5 C target is rapidly closing[2]; and (3) IPCC reports are overwhelmingly supported by the national academies of science in at least 80 countries, as well as by other scientific bodies, earth scientists, climate researchers, biophysical scientists, and other literature reviews.[78]

Institutes, politically conservative think tanks and their supporters, and authors who disseminate information that supports denialism about climate change dismiss the negative effects it has on the environment and human beings and instead focus on the negative consequences that targeting climate change has on the economy and on business opportunities, processes, and/or innovation.[79,80] Similarly, many corporations both around the world and in the United States ideologically and financially support lobbying efforts against proposed and existing legislation, policies, and regulations that may limit their participation in and profit from activities that may otherwise minimize and/or prevent further negative effects of climate change.[81]

Long-standing value biases and clinical practices that prioritize treating physical health over mental health needs (or ignore mental health) in usual health care instances also contribute to the scope of skepticism about the impacts that climate change has on mental health and well-being. Historically, the treatment of physical health has been prioritized over mental health for a myriad of ideological, political, social, and economic reasons.[2,82,83] While this imbalance is increasingly being recognized and addressed in global (e.g., the Universal Health Coverage Political Declaration[38]) and U.S.-based (e.g., the Affordable Care Act and the Mental Health and Parity Addictions Equity Act[40]) efforts, it still is not standard for physical health and mental health needs to be viewed and addressed equitably. This inequity also applies to approaches taken to address the effects of climate change on health, mental health, and well-being.[8]

For all of these foregoing reasons and others described throughout this policy statement, all stakeholders are urged to begin to engage in and/or further develop dialogues and collaborative actions so that common ground can be reached to more effectively address short- and long-term effects that climate change and climate-related events have on mental health and well-being around the world and in the United States. Furthermore, the well-accepted scientific precautionary principle directs policymakers to fulfill their social responsibility to protect the public from exposure to harm whenever scientific investigation reveals a plausible risk.[84] The information described throughout this policy statement is such an indicator of the negative plausible risks of climate change and climate-related events for mental health and well-being.

Action Steps

APHA urges:

  1. Global governments and the U.S. government; policymakers; program developers; service providers; public health, health, mental health, nonprofit, and business organizations; funders; communities at large; educators; researchers; advocates; the media; and all other interested stakeholders in the public and private sectors to prioritize and implement the recommendations of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030; the Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration; the 2015 Paris Agreement; the United Nations Universal Health Coverage Political Declaration; the Astana Declaration of Primary Care; the World Health Organization Mental Health Action Plan; and the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Guidelines for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings to ensure positive mental health and well-being for all individuals who are currently affected (or projected to be affected in the future) by climate change and climate-related events.
  2. The U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration; the U.S. National Institutes of Health; the National Institute of Mental Health; U.S. state and local governments; the American Psychological Association; the American Medical Association; other professional membership organizations; public health, health, mental health, nonprofit, and business organizations; service providers; program developers; funders; community partners at large; advocates; and all other interested stakeholders in the public and private sectors to prioritize and fully implement recommendations from the American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica reports on climate change and mental health and the CDC’s Climate and Health Program and climate and health adaptation plans to ensure positive mental health and well-being for all individuals who are currently affected (or projected to be affected in the future) by climate change and climate-related events .
  3. Global governments, the U.S. government, and communities at large to:
    • Assess and enhance service and system infrastructures, with attention to the aforementioned global and U.S. initiatives and agreements and with regard to planning and implementing a full scope of strategies and interventions that can be delivered directly or collaboratively at three main public health levels: primary (those that help reduce exposures to climate risks, especially plans and procedures for disaster risk reduction and prevention), secondary (those delivered immediately or shortly after a climate event, especially emergency responses that can help address and monitor mental health and well-being challenges), and tertiary (those that help people manage more serious and longer-term mental health and well-being issues related to climate change and/or a climate-related event).
    • Devlop, adopt, and implement policies, plans, programs, and services that acknowledge scientific evidence about the dangers of climate change and climate-related events and that seek to minimize the impacts of climate change and climate-related events on mental health and well-being
    • Increase funding and allocate adequate resources to strengthen public health, health, and mental health services and systems to positively address climate change effects on mental health and well-being, including strategies to decrease stigma associated with such effects
    • Increase financial investments in mental health and its workforce and as related to the effects of climate change and climate-related events.
  4. Global governments, the U.S. government, communities at large, researchers, and public health, mental health, and health program developers and service providers to continue to:
    • Conduct needs assessments about mental health and well-being to more comprehensively address climate change effects and to better integrate these components into larger health and environmental assessments related to climate change
    • Expand relevant research and evaluations to increase the evidence base for planning, taking action, and disseminating information about effective interventions, strategies, practices, policies, agreements, initiatives, and educational tools that can help prevent and address climate change impacts on mental health and well-being across cultures, especially for high-risk and low-resource groups, taking into account cultural sensitivity, gender, and respect for traditional practices
    • Develop, utilize, and disseminate indicators of climate change impacts on mental health and well-being, including costs
  5. Global and U.S. program developers and service providers to include strategies for how to operationalize all aspects of resilience (structural and psychosocial) and set and meet goals for posttraumatic growth in planning, implementing, monitoring, and sustaining services, procedures, and systems that address the effects of climate change and climate-related events on mental health and well-being.
  6. Global and U.S. public health, mental health, and health organizations, groups, and educational institutions to expand education and training of professionals, paraprofessionals, volunteers, students, and communities at large to develop and enhance core and advanced competencies in the science, interventions, strategies, and best practices for addressing climate change impacts on mental health and well-being, especially those that promote resilience, adaptation, constructive action, and hope.
  7. Government officials, program developers, service providers, educators, researchers, nonprofit and business organizations, funders, communities at large, advocates, and all other interested stakeholders in the public and private sectors to advocate with global and U.S. policymakers to ensure that the science relating climate change to mental health and well-being is included in initiatives, plans, policies, research, and funding for the public good and the public’s health, with special attention to the culture, age, gender sensitivity, and needs of populations, especially those who are vulnerable and at risk.
  8. Global and U.S experts and consultants in public health, mental health, substance use, health, government, science, research, program development, service provision, and education, as well as nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations; business, advocacy, and funding organizations; the media; and communities at large, to create multidisciplinary public health promotion campaigns and other educational programs to communicate effectively about the science behind climate change, its consequences for mental health and well-being, and the range of best and emerging practices, interventions, resources, and services that can help address impacts, especially those that promote resilience, adaptation, constructive action, and hope.
  9. Global and U.S. stakeholders in both the public and private sectors to create partnerships and/or coalitions to help achieve the actions and activities described above.

References

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch. Accessed December 27, 2019.

2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special report: global warming of 1.50C. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed December 27, 2019.

3. United Nations. Paris Agreement: status of ratification. Available at: https://unfccc.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

4. World Meteorological Organization. The state of the global climate in 2018: WMO provisional statement on the state of the global climate in 2018. Available at: https://www4.unfccc.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

5. California Natural Resources Agency and California Energy Commission. California’s changing climate 2018: a summary of key findings from California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Available at: https://www.energy.ca.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

6. Borunda A. Are Europe’s historic fires caused by climate change? Available at: https://www.nationalgeographic.com. Accessed December 27, 2019.

7. Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karisson S, Belesova K, Bouley T, Boykoff M. The Lancet countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. Lancet. 2017;391:581–630.

8. Clayton S, Manning CM, Krygsman K, Speiser M. Mental Health and Our Changing Climate: Impacts, Implications, and Guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica; 2017.

9. Dodgen D, Donato D, Kelly N, et al. Mental health and well-being. In: Crimmins AJ, Balbus J, Gamble JL, et al., eds. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global Change Research Project; 2016.

10. Gamble JL, Balbus J, Berger M, et al. Populations of concern. In: Crimmins AJ, Balbus J, Gamble JL, et al., eds. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global Change Research Project; 2016.

11. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. First responders: behavioral health concerns, emergency response, and trauma. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

12. Smith R, Newman E, Drevo S. Covering trauma: impact on journalists. Available at: https://dartcenter.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

13. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Analytical Study on Gender-Responsive Climate Action for the Full and Effective Enjoyment of the Rights of Women. Geneva, Switzerland: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; 2019.

14 Felten-Biermann C. Gender and natural disaster: sexualized violence and the tsunami. Development. 2006;49:82–86.

15. World Health Organization. Gender and health in disasters. Available at: http://www.who.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

16. Hayes K, Blashki G, Wiseman J, Burke S, Reifels L. Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts, and priority actions. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018;12:28.

17. Diener E, Ryan K. Subjective well-being: a general overview. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com. Accessed December 27, 2019.

18. Mares DM, Moffet KW. Climate change and interpersonal violence: a global estimate and regional inequities. Climate Change. 2016;135:297–310.

19. American Academy of Pediatrics. Global climate change and children’s health. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

20. World Health Organization Country Office for Bangladesh. Disasters and mental health. Available at: http://www.searo.who.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

21. Kessler RC, Galea S, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Ursano RJ, Wessely S. Trends in mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Molecular Psychiatry. 2008;13:374–384.

22. Schwartz RM, Gillezeau CN, Liu B, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Taioli E. Longitudinal impact of Hurricane Sandy exposure on mental health symptoms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:957.

23. Schwartz RM, Tuminello S, Kerath SM, Rios J, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Taioli E. Preliminary assessment of Hurricane Harvey exposures and mental health impacts. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:974.

24. American Psychological Association. Puerto Rico two years after Maria. Available at: https://www.apa.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

25. Fernandez A, Black J, Jones M, et al. Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review. PLoS One. 2015;10:4.

26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Climate and health: mental health and stress related disorders. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

27. Burke M, Gonzalez F, Baylis P, et al. Higher temperatures increase suicide rates in the United States and Mexico. Nature Climate Change. 2018;8:723–729.

28. Zhang X, Chen X, Zhang X. The impact of exposure to air pollution on cognitive performance. Available at: https://doi.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

29. Hanigan IC, Butler CD, Kokic PN, Hutchinson MF. Suicide and drought in New South Wales, Australia, 1970-2007. Available at: https://doi.org.1112965109. Accessed December 27, 2019.

30. Healthcare Foundation of Northern Sonoma County. Mental health for wildfire survivors. Available at: https://healthcarefoundation.net. Accessed December 27, 2019.

31. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:P171–P178.

32. mhGAP Operations Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.

33. National Institute of Mental Health. Mental illness. Available at: https://www.nimh.nih.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

34. Trautman S, Rehm J, Wittchen H. The economic costs of mental disorders. Available at: https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/embr.201642951. Accessed December 27, 2019.

35. Mental Health Atlas 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.

36. United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://www.un.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

37. United Nations. Political declaration of the High-level Meeting on Universal Health Coverage. Available at: https://www.un.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

38. Global Conference on Primary Health Care. Declaration of Astana. Available at: https://www.who.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

39. Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.

40. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. Available at: https://www.cms.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

41. World Bank. World Bank Group announces $200 billion over five years for climate action. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

42. Kuriansky J. Our communities: healing after environmental disasters. In: Nemeth DG, Hamilton RB, Kuriansky J, eds. Living in an Environmentally Traumatized World: Healing Ourselves and Our Planet. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger; 2010.

43. Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H. Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Available at: http://dx.doi.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

44. Graber R, Pichon F, Carabine E. Psychological resilience: state of knowledge and future research agendas. Available at: https://www.odi.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

45. Schultz JM, Galea S. Preparing for the next Harvey, Irma, or Maria—addressing research gaps. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1804–1806.

46. Hayes K, Poland B. Addressing mental health in a changing climate: incorporating mental health indicators into climate change and health vulnerability assessments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1806.

47. Marinucci GD, Luber G, Uejio CK, Saha S, Hess JJ. Building resilience against climate effects—a novel framework to facilitate climate readiness in public health agencies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:6433–6458.

48. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Global Change Research Program; 2016.

49. Zulch H. Psychological preparedness for natural hazards—improving disaster preparedness policy and practice. Available at: https://www.unisdr.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

50. Ebi KL, Boyer C, Bowen KJ, Frumkin H, Hess J. Monitoring and evaluation indicators for climate change-related health impacts, risks, adaptation, and resilience. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1943.

51. Rudolph L, Harrison C, Buckley L, North S. Climate change, health, and equity: a guide for local health departments. Available at: https://www.apha.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

52. Trombley J, Chalupka S, Anderko L. Climate change and mental health. Am J Nurs. 2017;117:44–52.

53. Ziegler C, Morelli V, Fawibe O. Climate change and underserved communities. Primary Care. 2017;44:171–184.

54. Kang P, Lv Y, Hao L, et al. Psychological consequences and quality of life among medical rescuers who responded to the 2010 Yushu earthquake: a neglected problem. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230:517–523.

55. Koger SM, Leslie KE, Hayes ED. Climate change: psychological solutions and strategies for change. Ecopsychology. 2012;3:227–235.

56. Baussan D. Social cohesion: the secret weapon in the fight for equitable climate resilience. Available at: https://www.americanprogress.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

57. Human Impact Partners. Case studies. Available at: https://healthequityguide.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

58. MacFarlane EK, Shakya R, Berry HL, Kohrt BA. Implications of participatory methods to address mental health needs associated with climate change. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed December 27, 2019.

59. Baussan D, Kelly C. Three strategies for building equitable and resilient communities. Available at: https://www.americanprogress.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

60. Marks LD, Hatch TG, Lu Y, Cherry KE. Families and faith-based communities after a disaster: success and failures in the wakes of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/. Accessed December 27, 2019.

61. Ogg J. Heatwave: Implications of the 2003 French Heat Wave for the Social Care of Older People. Paris, France: Young Foundation; 2018.

62. Poumadere M, Mays C, Le Mer S, Blong RJ. The 2003 heat wave in France: dangerous climate change here and now. Risk Analysis. 2006;25:1483–1494.

63. Greene G, Paranjothy S, Palmer SR. Resilience and vulnerability to the psychological harm from flooding: the role of social cohesion. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:1792–1795.

64. Stevan E, Hobfoll PW, Bell CC, et al. Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry. 2007;70:283–315.

65. Interagency Standing Committee. IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings. Available at: https://www.who.int. Accessed December 27, 2019.

66. Ross T. A Disaster in the Making: Addressing the Vulnerability of Low-Income Communities to Extreme Weather Events. Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress; 2013.

67. Lamond JE, Joseph RD, Proverbs DG. An exploration of factors affecting the long-term psychological impact and deterioration of mental health in flood households. Environ Res. 2015;40:325–334.

68. Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber, G, Malilay J, McGeehin M. Climate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:435–445.

69. American Psychological Association. The road to resilience. Available at: https://www.apa.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

70. Leong KJ, Airriess CA, Chen AC, Keith VM. Resilient history and the rebuilding of a community: the Vietnamese American community in New Orleans East. J Am Hist. 2007;94:770–779.

71. Nemeth DG, Kuriansky J, Reeder KP, et al. Addressing anniversary reactions of trauma through group process: the Hurricane Katrina Anniversary Wellness Workshops. Int J Group Psychotherapy. 2012;62:129–142.

72. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Available at: https://www.unisdr.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

73. United Nations High Commission on Refugees. The Global Compact on Refugees: final draft. Available at: https://www.unhcr.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

74. Sheehan MC, Fox MA, Kaye C, Resnick B. Integrating health into local climate response: lessons from the US CDC Climate-Ready States and Cities Initiative. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;20:125.

75. Giddens A. The Politics of Climate Change. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Polity Press; 2015.

76. Cook J. Skeptical science: global warming and climate change myths. Available at: https://www.skepticalscience.com. Accessed December 27, 2019.

77. Funk C, Kennedy B. The politics of climate: minority of U.S. adults see climate scientists’ research and understanding in a positive light. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

78. Cook J, Oreskes N, Doran, PT, et al. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Available at: http://iopscience.iop.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

79. Schmidt CW. Spheres of influence: a closer look at climate change skepticism. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:A537–A540.

80. Dunlap RE, Jacques PJ. Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. Am Behav Scientist. 2013;57:699–731.

81. A Climate of Corporate Control: How Corporations Have Influenced the U.S. Dialogue on Climate Science and Policy. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2012.

82. Prince MP, Vikram S, Shekhar M, et al. No health without mental health. Available at: https://doi.org. Accessed December 27, 2019.

83. Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. The Lancet Commission on Global Mental Health and Sustainable Development. Lancet. 2018;392:1553–1598.

84. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Welcome to the precautionary principle website. Available at: http://www.precautionaryprinciple.eu/. Accessed December 27, 2019.