Public Health Under Threat

Understanding the threat to public health

Under the Trump administration, we have seen a slew of proposed public health policies that threaten to undermine decades of progress in protecting the health of individuals, families, and communities across the United States. 

These dangerous proposals jeopardize critical public health systems, weaken protections for vulnerable populations and risk worsening health inequities.
Learn more about how Project 2025 will impact public health

Making sense of the buzzwords and protecting public health

You’ve probably heard the buzzwords — "Big Beautiful Bill," "Reconciliation," "FY 2025," "FY 2026," "Rescission Package." What do these terms mean, and how could they impact public health funding in your community?


APHA on key public health policy issues

Hear what APHA has to say about policy proposals that will impact public health.

The Reconciliation Act is not a victory for America

The passage of the reconciliation act is not a victory for America — and those who voted for it are not patriots and should be ashamed. This bill undermines our economic security by increasing our national debt to obscene levels.

The House must reject the President's bill passed by the Senate

Today the Senate has signed off on legislation that takes away health coverage from at least 16 million Americans, dramatically reduces access to necessary programs that feed people and ensures our air is less safe to breath. It also borrows from our kids and grandkids future by increasing our national debt by a whopping $3 trillion.

High Court Ruling Protects Access to Preventive Care

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc., upholding the constitutionality of the provision of the Affordable Care Act that mandates cost-free insurance coverage of preventive services recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force.  The ACA extends this benefit to virtually all privately-insured Americans.

Supreme Court Ruling on Planned Parenthood Threatens Access to Health Care

On June 26, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a case involving whether Medicaid beneficiaries can sue in federal court when a state limits their freedom to choose a qualified provider, as required by the Medicaid statute.  The Court held that Medicaid’s free choice of provider requirement cannot be privately enforced in federal court.

APHA's role in defending public health

APHA is fighting back. We remain steadfast in our efforts to challenge harmful policies, advocate for evidence-based approaches and defend the well-being of all Americans. 

APHA has been part of successful litigation and action challenging some of the biggest threats to public health. Read the latest testimony, comments and briefs and read all public letters to congress and federal agencies from APHA, including:

  • The House passed a budget reconciliation bill that would slash health coverage, food benefits and roll back environmental protections. APHA sent a letter to all members of the House urging them to oppose the bill and instead to work on legislation to expand health coverage, improve the nation’s public health system and strengthen and maintain important clean energy and clean air rules and programs. 
  • President’s FY 2026 proposed budget would eliminate or significantly cut critical public health programs and agencies. APHA issued a statement condemning the proposal and urging Congress to reject it and instead work on serious bipartisan appropriations bills that would protect and improve the public’s health.
  • Court rejects Trump administration request to pause APHA-backed lawsuit to stop illegal reorganization and RIFs at federal agencies. On April 28, APHA joined a coalition of nonprofits, unions and local governments in filing a complaint against the Trump administration’s massive unconstitutional federal agency reorganization and staff cuts across federal agencies. In the complaint, the groups tell the court that the president does not possess authority to reorganize, downsize, or otherwise transform the agencies of the federal government, unless and until Congress authorizes such action. 
  • Letter to HHS expresses concern about tobacco prevention efforts amid agency cuts. On May 21, APHA and 86 other organizations sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to express concern about the Trump administration’s reduction in force and unauthorized reorganization of federal agencies and the impact it will have on smoking prevention and cessation efforts. 

For Our Health

APHA launched a new initiative, ‘For Our Health,’ which builds on our longstanding commitment to champion optimal, equitable health and well-being for all. The members of For Our Health include former Secretaries of HHS, directors of the CDC, and former state health directors. 

Support for fired public health workers

To support those whose careers have been impacted by the increase in public health job losses, we've compiled a list of public health organizations and resources that provide job listings, professional development and networking opportunities in the public health sector.

APHA in the news

Learn more about all the ways APHA has spoken out in the media about these critical issues, including in The Hill, CNN, Politico, C-SPAN, ABC News, NBC News, Los Angeles Times, and more.

How you can help