The
following column was first published by “The Rural monitor” in its issue of summer,
2008. Myers’ columns appear quarterly
under the series title, “Look What’s Coming”.
Baghdad Crystal Ball
Wayne Myers, MD
In June, I was
one of several Americans invited to Baghdad as advisors to the Iraqi Ministry
of Health. The occasion was a national
conference on health care restoration and reform convened by the Ministry. I’d like to tell you some of what we saw and
heard.
First, Baghdad is a big city with about seven million
people. By way of comparison, Chicago
has nearly three million people within its city limits, but over nine million
within the three-state metropolitan area.
Baghdad has no mass transit system, so traffic is dense. Cars are old and breakdowns frequent. The city is battered but millions of people
are getting on with their daily lives.
Rental property is in increasing demand, as Baghdad becomes a reasonable
place to live and do business. Sidewalks are piled high with crates of new
merchandise for sale, especially generators.
Outside the International (“Green”) Zone, all the police and military
personnel I saw were Iraqi.
The current phase of health care reform is titled,
“Primary Care Reform First” (PCRF). The
Minister of Health and his colleagues propose to first overhaul the national
primary care system before dealing with hospitals and other elements. The five-day series of PCRF meetings
included three days of small group sessions reviewing specific proposals. Meetings held on the last two days reviewed
overall strategic proposals—these were large, formal sessions of several
hundred people including members of the Iraqi Parliament, leaders of most of
Iraq’s national health-related organizations, the Ministry of Health, the U.S.
military and State Department, the World Health Organization and several
non-governmental organizations. In all
the meetings the focus was national policy.
None considered rural problems separately.
Before the
Coalition invasion of 2003, Iraq had 2,000 public clinics providing some care
for an average of 14,000 patients each.
Most closed during and after the invasion but practically all are now
operating. Iraqi doctors have traditionally
been required to work in the morning in these public free clinics for a few
dollars per month. Doctors earn their
livings in private practice clinics in the afternoon. This divided system is generally acknowledged
to work poorly with patients being rushed through the public clinics, and
occasionally seen in groups, by doctors hurrying to get to their private
fee-for-service practices. One of the
priority reforms for the Ministry of Health is to separate public and private
practice, paying reasonably for doctors making careers in public care. Salaries for public clinic work are expected
to increase from three dollars per month for work in the morning clinics to
3,000 dollars per month for full-time doctors in the public clinics.
The professionalization of public clinics may be
particularly helpful in rural areas.
Rural and other hard-to-staff clinics are now heavily dependent on young
doctors in mandatory national service between internship and specialty
residency. In 2004, during an earlier
two-week trip to Northern, Kurdish Iraq, I encountered only one fully trained
career rural physician. All the others
were short-term assignees straight out of internship. Rural hospitals were battered and poorly
supplied but clean with staff proud of their work. My impression was that physician coverage was
the weakest element in the rural system of care. Rural Iraqis face hazards ranging from land
mines to cholera with care by partially trained personnel. U.S. rural health care has its problems but they
are of a different order than those in Iraq.
Iraq has no health insurance. Serious illness often means family
bankruptcy. The Ministry of Health is
determined to develop a system of health insurance in the course of primary
care reform. I could not determine
whether a decision or consensus has been reached regarding the nature of the
national insurance system: public or private, for-profit or not-for
-profit. The insurance program is seen
as an important contribution the government can make to stabilize private
fee-for-service care.
Nursing is a new profession in Iraq. In the past nurses got their training in
vocational high schools. Quite recently
the nursing high schools have been closed.
Several universities have established nursing programs using faculty
trained in other countries. The
professionalization of nursing in Iraq is an enormous task and complex
challenge.
Some basic
management systems are lacking or not well understood. Stories of corruption in the UN Oil for Food
program, in contractors under the Coalition Provisional Authority and in the
Iraqi Government have been widely reported.
At the moment, though, fear of corruption is also a serious
problem. Last year the Ministry of
Health reportedly spent less than 70 percent of its budget. Officials were often unwilling to release
funds that might be diverted.
Establishment of basic management systems is an urgent need.
Other major challenges include the establishment of
pharmaceutical and medical supplies manufacturing across Iraq, the
modernization of clinical data systems and carving out a reasonable share of
the national budget for health.
Will the Iraqis succeed in reforming their national
approach to health? I think there is a
good chance that they will accomplish several of their goals. In the final plenary meetings there seemed to
be general consensus on many points.
Iraq is writing on a blank slate.
They have some oil income to work with.
The clinic system is getting back on its feet as physicians return to
the country and security improves. There
is a sense of urgency.
There is a lot to be done. A half-dozen Americans are being recruited to
help the Iraqis draft policies, procedures and standing orders to implement all
these changes. If you are willing and
able to consider doing high-level national policy work in Baghdad, drop me an email
for more information at wwm@midcoast.com.